Manchin, Kirk, Wicker Urge Federal Banking Officials to Protect Community Banks
Senators send letter to correct a bureaucratic oversight by the regulators of the Dodd-Frank Act’s Volcker Rule
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Roger Wicker (R-MS) today sent a letter to federal officials who oversee banking rules, including Treasury Secretary Lew and Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke, in order to ensure community banks are protected from the broad brush of federal regulation. Due to a technical oversight in the Volcker Rule, which was intended to protect the U.S. economy from risky bets by large banks, community banks fear that they would have to write off hundreds of millions of dollars in capital in just a couple of weeks. In addition, if the rule is not addressed immediately, the banks would be required to sell securities at depressed values. This oversight would not only severely punish community banks, but it would also undermine the U.S. economy and financial stability.
The letter, in part, states: “The purpose of the Volcker Rule was to ensure that the trading activities of the big banks do not undermine the U.S. economy and financial stability, not to punish community banks. In finalizing the Volcker Rule, regulators have wisely sought to ensure that these community banks, which had nothing to do with the actions that necessitated the Volcker Rule in the first place, were not negatively impacted. Unfortunately, that cannot be said about the treatment of pools of trust-preferred securities (“TruPs”) owned by community banks.
“We urge each of your agencies to take action swiftly to grant relief to those financial institutions that had nothing to do with the 2008 economic crisis, but will have everything to do with our economic recovery.”
Please read the full text of the letter below:
Dear Secretary Lew, Chairman Bernanke, Commissioner Curry, Chairman Gensler, Chairman Gruenberg, Chairwoman White:
We write regarding the recently finalized Volcker Rule requirements of Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act (“BHC Act”) as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”). We know the agencies embarked on a long, arduous process, and there is no doubt the financial industry needed this rule before we could truly move on from the 2008 financial crisis. However, we have said from the outset that community banks were not responsible for that crisis, and they should not have to pay the price for Wall Street’s misconduct. We have consistently urged the agencies to ensure that community banks are protected from the broad brush of federal regulation.
The purpose of the Volcker Rule was to ensure that the trading activities of the big banks do not undermine the U.S. economy and financial stability, not to punish community banks. In finalizing the Volcker Rule, regulators have wisely sought to ensure that these community banks, which had nothing to do with the actions that necessitated the Volcker Rule in the first place, were not negatively impacted. Unfortunately, that cannot be said about the treatment of pools of trust-preferred securities (“TruPs”) owned by community banks.
The Volcker Rule is not the appropriate vehicle for the regulators to revisit how community banks manage their portfolios of TruPs. Indeed, unless your agencies take action immediately, a sizable number of community banks will have to liquidate their performing pools of TruPs and take an accounting loss – hurting earnings and capital. The intent of these previously approved investments was to strengthen capital in community banks. If held to maturity, these securities would most likely not have mandated losses.
If the regulators stand by the misdirected application of the Volcker Rule to community bank TruPs, the impacts could be devastating to shareholders and the capital of a large number of community banks across the country. These banks would be required to recognize a write-off in the current quarter for any unrealized losses from holding the security and would be required to liquidate the security by July 2015. If the bank was able to hold these securities until maturity, the anticipated loss would be zero. The unrealized losses embedded in the securities today are related to the illiquid market for these securities, rather than true credit losses.
In addition, the rule would not only require banks to mark the TruPs to current market prices, which are still somewhat depressed, but would also result in a fire sale from a required July 2015 divestment, which would further push prices down and could result in severe and unnecessary losses. One of the purposes of the Volcker Rule is to reduce the exposure of banks to the ups and downs of securities trading markets; yet the application of it to TruPs of community banks actually makes the situation worse.
These actions are completely unwarranted since the agencies could easily rely on their authorities to grant a carve-out or a grandfather status to banks under a certain asset size for their ownership of these types of securities acquired prior to the final rule. The agencies have admitted in their guidance for community banks that “[o]nly a small number of community banks own . . . collateralized debt obligations . . . backed by trust preferred securities.” Accordingly, there is very little to no systemic risk for community banks to continue to own these securities. On the other hand, the effect on the banks to divest these securities in relatively short order would be devastating. It is obvious to conclude that the community banks deserve relief, such as an exception or a grandfather status from this rule.
As you probably know, several community banks have voiced serious concern and are truly fearful of their reporting requirements at the end of this year. We urge each of your agencies to take action swiftly to grant relief to those financial institutions that had nothing to do with the 2008 economic crisis, but will have everything to do with our economic recovery.
###
Next Article Previous Article
